ICS EVIDENCE GOVERNANCE NOTEREGISTER · 2026

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY & STANDARDS DISPOSITION

Selenium-to-mercury ratios do not silently relax methylmercury controls

Retain the selenium-mercury ratio as a disclosed scientific debate and reject any automatic relaxation of a methylmercury requirement absent an explicit, externally governed rule.

The controlling scientific record is the public Heavy Metal Index synthesis, supported by 3 named anchor sources and expressed for Methylmercury, Mercury.

ICS does not reproduce the source extraction here. Keeping the evidence on the independent index preserves source-level methods, units, species, basis, uncertainty, and review state. This note records only the institutional consequence of that evidence.

Retain the selenium-mercury ratio as a disclosed scientific debate and reject any automatic relaxation of a methylmercury requirement absent an explicit, externally governed rule.

This disposition may change taxonomy, analyte coverage, test basis, surveillance priority, disclosure, or claim language. It does not allow a market occurrence percentile or a dramatic single study to become an initial certification value.

The finding is published in two additional authority layers: the HMI evidence record and the HMTc certification interpretation. Distribution should prioritize toxicologists, seafood suppliers, regulators, attorneys while preserving those distinct roles in headlines, briefings, interviews, and social posts.

Audience

toxicologists · seafood suppliers · regulators · attorneys

SUGGESTED CITATION

Pendergrass, K. (2026). “Selenium-to-mercury ratios do not silently relax methylmercury controls.” ICS Evidence Governance Notes. ICS-EGN-2026-014. Institute of Contaminant Standards.

Evidence governance register →